When trying to make our sport activities more inclusive often the focus is placed on fitting people with different needs and abilities into regular or standard activities.
Modifying or adapting sport activities to meet the needs, skills and abilities of participants can be a simple way for programs to be more inclusive. You can learn about some of the ways this can be done here. However, it is often assumed that the best or only way to create opportunities to participate is to change the regular or standard sport activities — you know, the ones we always deliver. This means that other options that might get people involved are often overlooked.
It is important to understand that inclusion encompasses many different options in a range of settings. It is not always about including a person in standard sport settings without any modifications and it’s also not just about making a few changes to standard activities either (although this is clearly a great place to start). So how do we go about creating more options for participation and go beyond what we always do?
Well, we can start by viewing inclusion in sport activities in terms of a spectrum. The inclusion spectrum is about considering the range of options available and adapting these to suit the needs, goals and capabilities of participants. Each element of the spectrum should be considered equally as important as the next. Ideally there would be activities on offer for a range of people to choose from across all elements.
Before we look at some examples here’s some background to this concept: Back in 1996 the first version of the Inclusion Spectrum was conceived by Ken Black. Ken’s original Inclusion Spectrum takes an activity-centred approach to inclusion of people of all abilities in physical activity. In other words, it is about considering the different ways sport can be presented. In this way, the Inclusion Spectrum offers methods that help sports practitioners strike a balance between the activities offered and the individual needs and wants of participants. The model was later redeveloped by Ken Black and Pam Stevenson into a more practical tool for application by sport practitioners.
This model has been used extensively in the UK and around the world since it was conceived. It has also been adapted. Most notably, a version of the Inclusion Spectrum was devised by the Australian Sports Commission (ASC). It takes the same activity-centred approach but offers an additional dimension by identifying non-playing roles as options for participation.
A point to note is that typically the inclusion spectrum has been applied to address the inclusion of people with disability in sport and physical activity — certainly this is the case for the ASC version — however, the principles can be equally applied to any individual or group who may have specific needs to consider and cater for. So when considering how you might apply the Inclusion Spectrum think about it in terms of broad inclusion of everyone.
Let’s look at the two models.
The Original Inclusion Spectrum
Image source: Ignite Sport UK
To see this in a sport specific context check out these resources:
The ASC Inclusion Spectrum
Image source: Australian Sports Commission
A sport specific adaptation
Swimming Australia adapted the Inclusion Spectrum model to suit the swimming context. They called it the Aquatic Activity Spectrum and again it adopts the same basic principles of the original Inclusion Spectrum but provides a sport-specific filter for a more effective application in the swimming and aquatic activity environment.
You can access the swimming resources here.
So, there you have it. Inclusion in sport is about creating a range of options. By applying the Inclusion Spectrum in conjunction with methods for adapting and modifying activities we can find more ways for more people to get involved.
Think about how the Inclusion Spectrum applies to your sport or activities. What are the different options available for people to participate in? Share in the comments!
Share this Post